It’s tough to argue that the past couple of years haven’t been tumultuous for the sustainable aviation fuel industry. When the U.S. SAF Grand Challenge debuted in 2021, the sector was riding an exciting wave of announced investments, partnerships and project development. Momentum was strong, and optimism toward meeting 2030 targets was widespread. But just a few years later, storm clouds rolled in.A recent report by Boston Consulting Group highlights that shift: “While SAF supply increased 1,150% worldwide over the past three years, project announcements for new SAF facilities declined 50% to 70% from 2022 to 2023, due primarily to economic uncertainty and higher energy and operating costs that squeezed company margins.” So, even though production volumes were rising, the project pipeline began to thin.Compounding the challenge has been ongoing policy uncertainty, particularly in the U.S., where long-delayed guidance on the 45Z clean fuel production tax credit left developers and investors waiting for clarity. For a very capital-intensive industry that heavily leans on long-term offtake agreements and stable policy signals, that uncertainty has caused many final investment decisions to hit the brakes. Many industry players are in observation, or wait-and-see mode, and that 2030 targets are unlikely to be achieved under current conditions, the BCG report suggests.Indeed, offtakes from airlines are a major factor. While airline involvement in SAF agreements is still growing, contract lengths are shrinking. Until 2023, according to the International Air Transport Association, the average announced duration exceeded six years. But as of January 2024, it fell to average a paltry two years.Production paints a clearer picture of the deviation of ambition and execution. A January 2025 progress report from the U.S. Department of Energy’s Bioenergy Technologies Office showed that 30 million gallons of SAF were produced domestically in the first three quarters of 2024, up from 5 million gallons in 2021. At the same time, announced domestic projects represented more than 3 billion gallons per year of potential capacity by 2030, tied to $44 billion in announced funding. On paper, if 100% of that announced capacity comes online as planned, domestic production would meet or even exceed the 3 billion gallon annual target. In reality, that outcome is extremely unlikely, as industry data suggests that only about a quarter of announced SAF capacity comes online on time, and roughly half of projects ultimately reach operation. That gap between press releases and production can often seem like the Grand Canyon.Difficulties persist and likely will for some time. But that does not mean the outlook is bleak. Shifting gears, there are indeed bright spots—45Z will be finalized, some commercial plants are ramping up, states are enacting policy to support SAF, new pathways are advancing through ASTM approval, and more countries are setting targets or mandates for SAF adoption. Those in the biofuels industry understand that progress isn’t linear. Cycles of expansion and contraction are part of the maturation process, and the SAF sector is still very much in that evolution.&nbsp;As for a specific bright spot, the Pacific Northwest has become a hot spot for SAF. In our page-12 feature article, “Accelerating Innovation,” associate editor Katie Schroeder reports on the Cascadia Sustainable Aviation Accelerator in Washington state, a coalition focused on driving SAF development and adoption forward with the ultimate goal of producing 1 billion gallons in the region by 2035. Made of up powerful industry stakeholders including Boeing, Washington State University, Alaska Airlines and the Port of Seattle, exciting things are on the horizon for this region of the U.S., and the accelerator’s members intend to demonstrate what can be replicated elsewhere. Said Josh Heyne, director of the Bioproducts Sciences and Engineering Lab at WSU, “Washington has many of the key attributes to accelerate that market and push it forward into something bigger, not only for the state but globally as well.”On that note, we’re excited to share that the North American SAF Conference &amp; Expo is moving to Tacoma, Washington, in 2026, after three consecutive years in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area. More will be shared in the upcoming months, but be sure to mark your calendars for Aug. 25-27.Author: Anna Simet&nbsp; Editor&nbsp; asimet@bbiinternational.com

2026-03-09 - Despite Challenges, the Beat Goes On (SAF Magazine)

small_Anna-Simet-2025.jpg

thumbnail_Anna-Simet-2025.jpg

Anna-Simet-2025.jpg

Despite Challenges, the Beat Goes On

The issuance of proposed guidance on the 45Z Clean Fuel Production Credit by the United States Treasury Department in February finally offered some clarity for program participants who have spent months in the dark on the status and scope of their returns. While the proposed guidance addresses issues over the definition of a “qualified sale” in the scheme, in recent weeks, sources have said that the final package should also clarify issues with using one finished fuel to create another.Under the guidance offered by Treasury on Feb. 3, the agency noted that, “if one fuel is used as a primary feedstock to produce a second fuel, and the first fuel qualifies as a transportation fuel for purposes of section 45Z, the second fuel would not qualify for a section 45Z credit.“For instance, SAF produced from ethanol as a primary feedstock, and hydrogen produced from RNG as a primary feedstock, may not qualify as transportation fuel for purposes of section 45Z,” the agency continued. That language could sully the long-term plans for certain SAF pathways that rely on finished fuels, such as LanzaJet’s patented alcohol-to-jet process. LanzaJet became the first domestic producer to offer SAF using ethanol as a feedstock after opening its Freedom Pines Fuels facility in Soperton, Georgia, in November 2025.And while that facility currently only produces about 10 million gallons per year, in recent years, major ethanol proponents have put notable stock into the potential expansion of operations that turn their fuel into SAF. In a fact sheet from 2024, the Renewable Fuels Association noted that “ethanol is a readily available low-carbon, low-cost feedstock for the production of SAF. With the right mix of policy, investment and science, the sky is the limit for ethanol-based SAF," RFA said at the time.The idea even found support in 2023 from former President Joe Biden, who, at an event in Maine, told attendees that in 20 years, “farmers are going to be providing 95% of all the sustainable airline fuel.”But with waning market incentives for SAF over other renewable fuels, momentum toward a significant expansion of SAF produced from other biofuel sources could be in peril under current guidance. Some of those waning incentives stem from changes made to 45Z last summer under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which put SAF on the same pricing tier of 20 cents to $1 per gallon, as all other biofuels for 45Z.With the guidance also offering other positive developments for the ethanol industry, such as getting rid of indirect land use change from emissions calculations, producers of the biofuel could gain more from selling their fuel through traditional pathways than by sending it to be converted into SAF. &nbsp;In commentary offered on Feb. 13, global tax firm Latham &amp; Watkins noted that the proposal allows “a fuel to qualify for the 45Z credit if its production process uses a transportation fuel solely as a process fuel or other nonprimary feedstock input.”[Treasury’s guidance] was just implementing what was in the law, which is that only one of the parties can be the taxpayer...you cannot get on both sides of it,” said Anthony Reed, a partner with FGS Global, in regard to the proposed guidance.The final destination for a 45Z credit is not purely of concern to certain SAF producers. As stated by the Renewable Natural Gas Coalition following the issuance of the proposal, the organization is “eager to address certain limitations around the use of RNG as a process input, or feedstock for the production of other qualifying transportation fuels.”The Treasury could ultimately alter its guidance in the final package to better clarify the current landscape for SAF produced from other finished biofuels, explained Shia Sahay, a partner with Bracewell PRG, a day after the release. “There is going to be a disadvantage for certain technologies,” due to the language on double counting credits,” Sahay said.&nbsp;This could have been done differently, Sahay added. “[Treasury] could have just said, ‘Well, if you sell feedstock to someone else who uses that feedstock to produce fuel, you cannot take 45Z.’”Others more informed on the ethanol side of the equation also shared concerns over the dynamic. Monte Shaw, executive director of the Iowa Renewable Fuels Association, said “in terms of 45Z pushing alcohol-to-jet forward, we are at best in neutral.”The parties who are concerned over the final recipient of a 45Z credit in production processes that use a finished fuel will have ample time to craft their arguments, as the agency scheduled its public hearing on the proposal for May 28.&nbsp;A final package is expected sometime this summer.Author: Patrick Newkumet&nbsp; OPIS Biofuels&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;

2026-03-09 - Treasury’s Proposed 45Z Guidance Draws Concerns Over Alcohol-to-Jet SAF (SAF Magazine)

small_column-saf-newkumet-0126.jpg

thumbnail_column-saf-newkumet-0126.jpg

column-saf-newkumet-0126.jpg

Treasury’s Proposed 45Z Guidance Draws Concerns Over Alcohol-to-Jet SAF

As the sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) industry continues to scale, project viability depends on much more than promising chemistry. While new pathways and technologies continue to emerge, many projects struggle to bridge the gap between laboratory validation and reliable, large-scale operations—especially when multiple first-of-a-kind elements are integrated into a single facility.For <a href="https://www.vistaprojects.com/?utm_source=saf_magazine&amp;utm_medium=paid_article&amp;utm_campaign=industry_pub&amp;utm_content=march_feature&amp;utm_term=vistaprojects ">Vista Projects</a>, a Calgary, Alberta-based engineering and project delivery firm, that reality has defined its growing role in the SAF sector. “We’ve seen firsthand: Just because the chemistry works doesn’t mean the commercial project will work,” says Arman Hassan, a project manager at Vista Projects. “Scaling and integrating a process into a continuously operating commercial plant is a very steep climb.”Digital Execution to SAF Engineering&nbsp; Vista was initially brought into a SAF project to establish a digital project execution environment integrating engineering, construction and operations.That engagement quickly expanded. “What started as front-end engineering support and advisory services evolved into full detailed engineering, procurement support and owner’s engineering,” Hassan says. The project—an electro-SAF (eSAF) facility using a first-of-a-kind technology configuration—presented both technical and commercial challenges. Vista ultimately assumed most of the engineering scope after the previous contractor struggled to manage the project’s complexity. According to Hassan, success depended on ensuring all plant systems and interfaces could be delivered and run as one integrated facility.Vista has since expanded into a commercial-scale gas-to-liquids project using the Fischer-Tropsch pathway and expects to support multiple pathways as demand evolves, helping owners clear key project gates by bringing execution discipline, integration capability and delivery experience.Compounding Complexity&nbsp; Across pathways, Hassan says it’s often underestimated how quickly complexity compounds when new SAF technologies are integrated with utilities/offsites, hydrogen, storage and blending, and stringent fuel specifications—often simultaneously.&nbsp;Adding to that challenge are interface gaps between licensors, EPC firms and vendors. Scope splits that appear logical during development can create significant risk once projects enter detailed engineering. “Late design validation, late HAZOPs and late operational requirements are all symptoms of insufficient front-end discipline,” Hassan says. “So, it’s really important to pick the right partners and licensors.”Even when engineering is optimal, external constraints—permitting timelines, labor availability and construction constraints—can still derail schedules.Much More Than Drawings&nbsp; Vista views itself as a project developer’s engineering partner—an approach it believes is critical for SAF projects, especially those led by startups or new entrants. “A lot of projects fall apart when there isn’t a strong owner team managing interfaces, risk and decision-making,” Hassan says. “<a href="https://www.vistaprojects.com/consulting/owners-engineering-projects/?utm_source=saf_magazine&amp;utm_medium=paid_article&amp;utm_campaign=industry_pub&amp;utm_content=march_feature&amp;utm_term=ownersengineering ">Owner’s engineering</a> is about protecting the owner’s interests, not just delivering drawings.”That role includes overseeing licensors and EPC contractors, managing change, driving cost and schedule transparency, aligning stakeholders and ensuring technical decisions connect back to commercial reality. Vista also supports partner selection, providing an impartial view on licensors, EPCs, fabricators, constructors and key vendors grounded in execution track record.One of the most common pitfalls Vista sees is inadequate front-end definition, particularly when teams move quickly past feasibility. “Strong front-end definition—a clear design basis, realistic yields and structured cost estimates—is critical to avoid sticker shock as projects move forward,” Hassan says.Another risk area is scale-up strategy. Many SAF projects attempt to leap from lab proof-of-concept to commercial operation without sufficient intermediate validation, limiting opportunities to confirm performance and operability under pilot or demonstration conditions.Feedstock: A Core Design Basis&nbsp; As competition for SAF feedstocks intensifies, Vista urges developers to rethink how feedstock is treated during project development. “Feedstock is a core design basis that affects pretreatment, catalysts, corrosion, wastewater, reliability and overall economics. So, you have to design for it deliberately.”Seasonality, quality variation, supply-chain logistics and local constraints should be reflected in plant design from the outset, along with a realistic understanding of how impurities affect performance and maintenance. Hassan notes that downstream requirements can be overlooked early, including product specifications and certification expectations that influence design and operations.While many developers seek maximum feedstock flexibility, Vista cautions that flexibility comes at a cost. “You can design for a range within a targeted envelope, but you can’t design a plant to handle everything while meeting the project’s economic drivers,” Hassan says.De-Risking with the Right Partners&nbsp; As SAF development continues, Vista is strengthening its repeatable delivery playbook by incorporating lessons learned, standardized risk frameworks and improved execution strategies. The company also leans on modularization and digital execution expertise to reduce field costs, improve transparency and manage complexity—especially in high-cost jurisdictions where labor constraints can dominate project economics.“We’re applying what we’ve learned from projects over the years—we’re very strong around hydrocarbon processing and complex energy projects, including startup-led development—to help future developers de-risk their approach,” Hassan says.For companies entering the SAF space, Vista’s advice is straightforward. “Don’t shortcut feasibility,” Hassan adds. “Define your feedstock and offtake early, choose partners with execution experience, and design for real-world operating conditions—not lab science. It’s a technically exciting space with real potential, but you have to de-risk early with disciplined execution and the right partners.”<a href="www.vistaprojects.com">www.vistaprojects.com</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;

2026-03-12 - SPOTLIGHT | VISTA PROJECTS: De-Risking SAF with the Right Design (SAF Magazine)

SPOTLIGHT | VISTA PROJECTS: De-Risking SAF with the Right Design

The Cascadia region, also known as the Pacific Northwest, covers thousands of miles of forests, mountains and cities, from northern California to the Alaskan Panhandle, ranging from the coastline of the Pacific Ocean in the West to Montana in the East. &nbsp;Isolated geographically from the rest of the United States, local communities have built pipeline infrastructure independent from the network of pipes that serve the rest of the country. In the middle of this region is the state of Washington; its economy entwined with aerospace companies and global corporations such as Amazon and Microsoft.&nbsp;The aerospace industry plays a significant role in the state’s economy, generating $71 billion in revenue for its businesses, according to the Association of Washington Businesses. Capitalizing on the region’s localized fuel infrastructure and a strong aviation industry, the Cascadia Sustainable Aviation Accelerator launched in January 2026, planning to drive the adoption of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) in Washington and throughout the Pacific Northwest. “We have a unique opportunity in the region we call Cascadia, to really take advantage of some of the uniqueness of our region. We’re completely cut off from the rest of the supply chain for fuel products that travel through the network of pipelines that crisscross the nation and supply refining operations, and so we have to produce what we use here,” says Tim Zenk, managing director of Earth Finance and an early founder of CSAA.Local Impact&nbsp; The coalition seeks to drive SAF development and adoption forward with the ultimate goal of producing 1 billion gallons of SAF in the region by 2035. As the home of aviation giant Boeing and the nation’s first state SAF tax credit, CSAA will leverage local aviation interests to increase local SAF capacity, reduced technological uncertainty, more regional economic value and improved air quality.&nbsp;A group of Washington state’s deep bench of aviation expertise, fuel refining experience, sustainability goals and corporate interests inspired the creation of CSAA. The Port of Seattle, Snohomish County, Alaska Airlines, Boeing, Washington State University, Microsoft, Earth Finance and Amazon all played a role in the coalition’s creation. “We brought this idea to leadership of the companies who are aboard, which is Boeing, Amazon and Washington State [University] and were able to convince the legislature to invest $10 million ... and the legislature was matched by a family office, philanthropic contribution of another $10 million,” Zenk says. &nbsp;Headquartered in Seattle since the 1960s, Alaska Airlines is well established in the state, according to Ryan Spies, managing director of sustainability for Alaska Airlines. “We really feel integrated into the state, more than any airline certainly, and obviously also having Boeing up the street,” Spies says. “We have a tremendous partnership with the premier aerospace developer in the world. They call Seattle ‘Jet City,’ and we’re happy to be a part of that."Boeing manufactures its airplanes in Snohomish County, and 65,024 of its 181,984 employees live in the state as of December 2025. According to Ryan Faucett, vice president of sustainability partnerships with Boeing, SAF plays a critical role in the company’s decarbonization strategy. SAF’s emission profile is compelling: The base model used by the aircraft industry estimates that 30% to 70% of emissions reductions will come from SAF alone, according to Faucett. The company joined CSAA to contribute its technical expertise, policy guidance and aviation leadership.Besides being home to Boeing, another factor that upped Washington’s appeal to serve as the organization’s headquarters was the state’s SAF production incentives, Zenk explains. The SAF tax credit, which came into effect in 2023, stands at $1 per gallon of SAF with a minimum of 50% carbon intensity reduction, increasing by two cents for each percentage point CI reduction above 50%, reaching a max potential total of $2 per gallon.&nbsp;Now, CSAA aims to educate, equip and enable increased SAF production throughout the Pacific Northwest. Earth Finance estimates that spending on SAF projects will have a return on investment 14 times over the initial amount. The region is the fifth-largest refining center in the U.S., and Zenk believes that the refiners are the “fastest path” to bringing fuels such as SAF there.&nbsp;Most of Pacific Northwest’s liquid fuels—including gasoline, diesel and jet fuel—are supplied via the 400-mile Olympic Pipeline, which runs from Whatcom County in northern Washington to Portland, Oregon. “The realities of the infrastructure that we have to deal with today means that we need to figure out a way to be self-sufficient as a region,” Spies says. “I think the other piece is just the concentration of high technology organizations that have an interest in and charge to address climate. We are in a region where people care about this and understand the realities of the challenges ahead.”Supporting SAF adoption also entails de-risking the permitting process for SAF producers and enhancing feedstock access. Spies also identifies Washington’s permitting process as one area in need of improvement, because currently, for new products and new producers, the process is challenging to navigate. “Reducing those technical barriers to [leverage] our own feedstocks is really critical for woody materials, waste agriculture, RNG and all the other sources of carbon that we think are potentially economically viable, but require some technical work,” Zenk adds.Industry Intent&nbsp; Airlines and manufacturers are pursuing sustainability as a next chapter of aviation innovation. As airlines pursue net-zero emissions goals and more sustainable operations, they are working within a narrow profit margin, Spies explains. According to data from the Bureau of Transportation statistics released in 2025, net income margins systemwide in 2024 stood at 2.7%.&nbsp;These margins make fuel cost a critical factor in finding a suitable, low-carbon replacement for conventional jet fuel. Spies explains that Alaska Airlines follows a five-part sustainability plan. The first step is to maximize operation efficiency, utilizing each drop of fuel as effectively as possible. The second area for consideration is the airplane fleet, retiring older planes and replacing them with new ones that are 15% to 25% more efficient. SAF is the third part of the plan and is especially important over the next 15 to 20 years, according to Spies. Alaska Airlines pursues new technologies and utilizes carbon offsets as the fourth and fifth components of the company’s sustainability strategy.&nbsp;“SAF is a drop-in fuel, so that means we don’t have to change planes or how planes operate to use it,” he says. “We don’t have to change traditional fueling infrastructure to use it, which are all highly capital intensive things, and so if we can avoid having to change those, SAF is a really great option.”Boeing also sees SAF’s value as a near-term carbon reduction opportunity that doesn’t require changing aircraft design or airport infrastructure, Faucett explains. It’s unlikely that airplanes powered by electricity or hydrogen will be available for widespread use before 2050—especially not for long-haul flights.&nbsp;Technical Innovation&nbsp; CSAA partner Washington State University drives innovation forward through research. Josh Heyne serves as the director of the Bioproducts Sciences and Engineering Lab at WSU Tri-cities and co-director of the WSU PNNL Bioproducts Institute. As the Federal Aviation Administration’s official prescreening lab, Heyne and his team assess fuel samples from SAF innovators around the world, testing each one for the qualities critical to airplane engine operability. The tests examine “the ability of a fuel to maintain combustion or burn in an engine, and the ability to ignite or relight under kind of extreme thermodynamic conditions at altitude,” Heyne says.&nbsp;Based on the results, he and his team provide feedback to the companies, educating them on how to best move forward. This insight includes identification of the areas that would likely prevent a sample from being certified by ASTM and as a viable jet fuel.&nbsp;Because many of the fuels sent to the lab are in early stages of development with limited volumes available, the 36 pieces of equipment used there were selected due to their ability to get results with only a small sample, and all function to help new technologies develop. For those unmeasurable data points that require larger samples, Heyne and his team develop predictions based on the chemical composition of the fuel. “Our lab has developed the ability to take pretty detailed chemical compositions and predict properties that there are not enough volume of to measure,” Heyne says. “We call that tier alpha within the group for prescreening, and we’re able to predict other properties that we don’t have enough volume to measure.”Due to the lab’s work with the National Jet Fuels Combustion Program, lab staff are able to extrapolate how the qualities observed in the samples would behave in an airplane and impact the jet engine. One such consideration is the assessing the potential of a “flame blowout,” which occurs in the air when a pilot pulls back the thrust at altitude and the flame goes out. Fuel sensitivity is connected to this occurrence, Heyne explains. In such a scenario, the pilot will reignite the engine, so the ability of the fuel to relight when at altitude is critical.&nbsp;“Fuel properties are really important in terms of how easy it is to ignite a fuel in an engine,” he says. “So that ... is what we’ve really specialized with historically, and being able to provide that type of information to producers has been valuable.”According to Heyne, the prescreening works as a step toward a key issue for the SAF industry: fungibility, meaning the creation of 100% drop-in SAF. Faucett also discusses the importance of 100% drop-in fuel from the aircraft manufacturer perspective, expressing that Boeing is “excited” about moving beyond the current requirement capping SAF use at a 50% blend with conventional jet fuel. The creation of a 100% drop in SAF would eliminate the need for blending equipment and reduce the cost of using SAF. “We’re trying to do our part to understand from a R&amp;D and supply chain perspective, what it takes to use higher blends of SAF,” he says.&nbsp;Though there are many steps between the current reality and 1 billion gallons of SAF, Heyne sees an opportunity to rise to the challenge. “This is a developing market,” he says, “and Washington has many of the key attributes to accelerate that market and push it forward into something bigger, not only for the state but globally as well.”Finding Feedstock&nbsp; The forests of the Cascadian region potentially offer a low-carbon feedstock for SAF production due to the volume of waste residues available. Zenk explains that the sheer degree of wood waste available could be comparable to the Midwest’s ethanol-to-jet opportunity. Earth Finance estimates that the supply of woody biomass could be enough to make 6 billion gallons of SAF each year. Alongside woody biomass, the agricultural commodities that flow through the state could also serve as a plentiful feedstock source. &nbsp;Spies calls the feedstock obstacle SAF’s “big question,” one that CSAA plans to address by doing a feedstock assessment for the region. Currently, any and all feedstocks are under consideration, but “at some point we’ll need to make bets,” he says. Assessing feedstocks helps the industry determine what will work at the scale needed to make billions of gallons of SAF in future.&nbsp;Several projects are underway across the region, using a variety of feedstocks. Currently under development in Washington is SkyNRG’s Project Wigeon, located in eastern Washington at the Port of Walla Walla’s Wallula Gap Industrial Business Park. SkyNRG intends to produce 50 MMgy of SAF from syngas. In Oregon, NXTClean Fuels is in the process of developing an SAF and renewable diesel facility on the Columbia River, which would produce up to 50,000 barrels of clean fuel per day. The facility intends to use waste oils and greases as its feedstock.&nbsp;Both Zenk and Heyne point to the positivity surrounding CSAA’s efforts as something that excites them regarding the future of SAF in Cascadia. “I think Washington really does have a phenomenal ecosystem in this space right now,” Heyne adds. “And I don’t see anything but a continuation of the development of that ecosystem and the support systems for new producers looking at the state. So, I have a ton of optimism about it here in Washington.”Author: Katie Schroeder&nbsp; Associate Editor, SAF Magazine&nbsp; katie.schroeder@bbiinternational.com&nbsp; &nbsp;

2026-03-09 - Accelerating Innovation (SAF Magazine)

small_feat1-saf-Alaska-Airlines-0126.jpg

thumbnail_feat1-saf-Alaska-Airlines-0126.jpg

feat1-saf-Alaska-Airlines-0126.jpg

medium_SAF-Truck-Photo-Boeing.jpg

small_SAF-Truck-Photo-Boeing.jpg

thumbnail_SAF-Truck-Photo-Boeing.jpg

SAF-Truck-Photo-Boeing.jpg

small_feat1-saf-CSAA-Group-0126.jpg

thumbnail_feat1-saf-CSAA-Group-0126.jpg

feat1-saf-CSAA-Group-0126.jpg

In the Pacific Northwest, a new coalition has mobilized to accelerate sustainable aviation fuel production, confronting the challenges shaping this emerging industry.

Accelerating Innovation

Biofuels continue to expand beyond road transportation into sectors such as aviation, marine, industrial and power markets, with original equipment manufacturers emerging as influential and often underreported players in the biomass value chain.Among them is John Deere, a global manufacturer of agricultural equipment and engine systems serving farmers worldwide, which is taking a more visible role in shaping how farmers participate in renewable fuel markets, from biodiesel and ethanol to emerging sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) pathways.Through expanded equipment approvals, fuel-flexible engine development, digital data platforms and deeper policy engagement, the company is positioning itself as both a technology provider and a market signaler in the bioenergy transition.The B30 Decision&nbsp; In fall 2025, John Deere announced approval of B30 biodiesel across its entire Tier 4 engine portfolio, which marked a significant step beyond its previous B20 guidance. Josh Garetson, director of renewable fuels and corporate strategy at John Deere, says the decision was about more than technical confidence—it was about strengthening demand for the crops farmers grow and reinforcing the circular nature of modern agriculture. “At the time, it was a good move. It was probably pushing the envelope a little bit from where certain policy was,” Garetson says. “We started thinking about what more we could be doing to help customers with sustainability.”Internal discussions led the company to engage with fuel providers and trade associations while evaluating how biodiesel standards and product quality had evolved. “We worked through how the standards have improved and how product quality has improved, and that got us comfortable saying, ‘Hey, we think this is going to work,’” Garetson says.Beyond technical validation, the move was designed to reinforce the “farm gate” value proposition. “This is an opportunity to help with the farm gate, which is really the most important part of this,” Garetson says. “We are committed to supporting and growing the use of renewable fuels in our equipment, and renewable fuels play a critical role in supporting the agriculture economy.”By approving B30, John Deere is allowing customers the option to leverage higher biodiesel blends in their own operations, especially those who grow renewable fuel feedstocks.All Tier 4 engines are now approved for B30, with earlier Tier 3 and lower-tier engines approved up to B100 biodiesel, and all engines capable of running RD100 renewable diesel. What’s more, John Deere’s spark-ignition turf and utility equipment is approved for E10, and the company is exploring higher ethanol blends, including a concept 9.0L engine designed to operate on E98.For farmers operating heavy equipment, B30 approval means the blend can be used in Tier 4 engines without equipment modification, provided fuel quality and storage best practices are followed. Garetson notes John Deere’s confidence stems from improved biodiesel standards and product quality over the past decade. At the same time, he stresses that adoption requires attention to tank cleanliness, seasonal considerations and coordination with fuel suppliers.Market Signals and Biomass Demand&nbsp; While off-road biodiesel utilization remains relatively modest, the company views equipment approvals as a catalyst for incremental adoption. “We think it’s probably not a very high level of utilization in off-road applications today,” Garetson says. “We’re hoping to move that up and get a few more people interested in B30.”Following the B30 announcement at the 2025 Farm Progress Show, Garetson notes that the industry took notice. “We were having conversations with fuel distributors not long after that,” he says. “It was a positive shock to the system.”That reaction underscores a central thesis: OEM approvals function as market signals. When a major manufacturer validates higher blends, fuel distributors, blenders and infrastructure providers reassess product offerings and investment plans.&nbsp;Greater compatibility can, over time, support stronger demand for feedstocks such as soybean oil, corn oil and animal fats, which are all critical inputs for biodiesel and renewable diesel, as well as increasingly for SAF.Garetson also points to John Deere’s willingness to demonstrate real-world success. This spring, the company plans to work with farmers using B30 to establish best practices and dispel persistent myths. “We want to help tell their story of what they need to do to be successful and how challenging it was,” he says. “That farmer-to-farmer storytelling is vital for broader adoption.”Policy, Platforms and the SAF Connection&nbsp; John Deere’s engagement extends beyond engine approvals into policy advocacy and digital infrastructure. The company has supported renewable fuels policy for decades, dating back to the early 2000s. Today, it is seeking a more visible seat at the table.&nbsp;“We recognize how important it is to the industry and to our customers,” Garetson says. He cites support for measures such as E15 expansion and acknowledges the importance of robust renewable volume obligations (RVOs). Weak RVOs in recent years, he notes, strained biodiesel economics. “Supportive policy is really important in making sure there’s a good economic foundation,” he says.Beyond policy, John Deere sees data as a bridge between farm practices and downstream fuel markets. Its Operations Center platform allows farmers to document field activities, enabling efficiency gains and potentially facilitating participation in low-carbon fuel incentives.As tax credits such as 45Z (successor to 45C/45Z discussions in renewable fuel production) emphasize carbon intensity, Garetson notes documentation will be critical. “Operations Center is a platform that’s going to enable that data sharing in a very streamlined, cost-effective way,” he says.For SAF, this is especially relevant. As aviation fuels increasingly depend on low-carbon feedstocks, growers who can document reduced carbon intensity may gain access to premium markets. John Deere’s role, then, is not just in engine compatibility, but in enabling traceability and carbon accounting at scale.The Sustainability Mindset&nbsp; Renewable fuels also intersect with John Deere’s Scope 3 emissions strategy. In its updated sustainability ambitions, the company reaffirmed its commitment to reducing value-chain emissions.&nbsp;From the company’s perspective, however, Scope 3 is inseparable from farmer economics. &nbsp;“It’s really about the value proposition to the farmer,” Garetson says. “Where renewable fuels help growers lower carbon intensity scores and potentially capture higher crop values, we aim to provide compatible solutions.”Fuel represents a varying share of carbon intensity depending on geography and cropping systems. For U.S. corn and soybean producers, fuel may be a smaller slice of total emissions compared to fertilizer or land use. Still, renewable fuels provide a tangible pathway to improvement, especially as carbon markets and SAF demand evolve.John Deere positions renewable fuels alongside precision agriculture as complementary tools. After all, precision technologies reduce input use and improve efficiency, while biofuels create circular economic loops.&nbsp;Garetson describes a “flywheel” effect: Stable renewable fuel policy supports crop prices, strengthening farm economics and enabling reinvestment in advanced practices.Addressing Misconceptions &nbsp;&nbsp; Despite progress, misconceptions linger. Early biodiesel experiences are often linked to inconsistent quality and storage challenges, and have left some operators wary. “Product quality has improved quite a bit,” Garetson says, “but lingering memories of past issues persist.”John Deere’s educational efforts emphasize proper storage and handling. Biodiesel interacts differently with metal than petroleum diesel, making tank cleanliness critical. &nbsp;“If the tank doesn’t have the right level of cleanliness, that’s where problems can arise,” he says. “Temperature considerations also matter. High biodiesel blends may be less suitable in extremely cold conditions, underscoring the importance of working closely with fuel providers to select appropriate blends seasonally.”In the near term, knowledge-sharing is a primary barrier. “Approving and announcing the ability to use B30 is kind of lighting the fuse, but we can’t just walk away,” Garetson says. “Farmer-to-farmer engagement will be key to scaling confidence.”Looking Ahead&nbsp;&nbsp; Electrification remains part of John Deere’s long-term portfolio, but Garetson acknowledges practical constraints. At high horsepower levels, batteries alone may not be feasible due to size and weight limitations. In those segments, liquid fuels such as diesel, biodiesel, renewable diesel and potentially high-ethanol blends remain central.The company’s concept E98 tractor reflects its broader philosophy as it provides options that align with customer applications. In regions with strong ethanol production, the ability to deliver corn to a plant and bring ethanol back to the farm creates an appealing circularity story.Whether the fuel is biodiesel, renewable diesel, ethanol, SAF or synthetic aviation fuel, Garetson believes multiple pathways will coexist. &nbsp;“Those are all fuel sources that are going to have places in the market,” he says.John Deere’s objective therefore is to help farmers remain integral players in that evolving landscape. By aligning equipment compatibility, digital platforms, sustainability goals and policy advocacy, the company is signaling that OEM decisions can shape biomass demand and emissions outcomes far beyond the field.Author: Keith Loria&nbsp; Contributing Writer, SAF Magazine

2026-03-09 - A New Chapter in Farm-Driven Biofuels (SAF Magazine)

small_feat2-saf-john-deere-lede-0126.jpg

thumbnail_feat2-saf-john-deere-lede-0126.jpg

feat2-saf-john-deere-lede-0126.jpg

small_feat2-saf-john-deere-0126.jpg

thumbnail_feat2-saf-john-deere-0126.jpg

feat2-saf-john-deere-0126.jpg

John Deere is emerging as a quiet catalyst in the bioenergy transition, expanding equipment compatibility, data tools and policy engagement to help farmers connect their crops to growing markets for biodiesel, renewable diesel and sustainable aviation fuel.

A New Chapter in Farm-Driven Biofuels

The aviation and maritime industries have both set ambitious decarbonization goals for the coming decades, and their growing reliance on fuels derived from biological feedstocks is bringing new overlap—and potential competition—into focus. As aviation works to meet future targets, its interactions with the maritime sector are becoming more apparent. Despite key differences, both industries depend on energy-dense liquid fuels to move people and goods over long distances, making biofuels such as SAF, biodiesel and ethanol natural options. Still, questions remain about whether sufficient biofuel production capacity and feedstock supply will be available to meet the needs of either sector, even as differing technologies and fuel requirements may allow both to progress without direct conflict.In the past, these sectors have been treated as separate markets, but aviation and maritime industry demands for vast amounts of feedstock raises concerns about who would get access to these resources. Market pressures and policy demands will likely influence competition and prioritization; however, critical differences between the two industries and innovations in biofuel production have the potential to shape biofuel markets over the next one to two decades.The Quest for Decarbonization&nbsp; Growing concern over carbon emissions and climate change has motivated the aviation and maritime industries to set ambitious emissions reduction goals. The International Civil Aviation Organization set a goal of reducing aviation’s carbon emissions by 5% by 2030 and reaching net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. Similarly, the International Maritime Organization established a set of regulations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from ships known as the IMO Net-Zero Framework. The most viable way to meet these goals is through the large-scale adoption of biofuels like SAF for aviation and biodiesel, sustainable diesel, and other options like methanol or ammonia for shipping.On-road biofuels like biodiesel, sustainable diesel and ethanol set the stage for biofuel adoption starting in the early 2000s. On-road fuels today consist of a blend of petroleum-based and biomass-derived fuels. For example, most of the gasoline sold in the United States contains around 10% ethanol. “In the U.S., we use ethanol made from corn, while Brazil uses sugar,” says Jonathan Lewis, Director of Transportation Decarbonization at the Clean Air Task Force, an organization focused on technological and policy-based solutions to carbon emissions. “That market has mostly plateaued.”There is now a growing emphasis on using biofuels for &nbsp; &nbsp;long-distance transport like aviation and shipping. However, unlike light-duty on-road vehicles, aircraft and ships are highly optimized for long-distance travel and have certain design and operation constraints that control the use of alternative fuel sources.Same But Different&nbsp; One potential cause for conflict between aviation and shipping when it comes to biofuel is that both industries have specific fuel requirements. Both aircraft and ships must be able to travel long distances without refueling, but have limited space for fuel. The use of batteries would be impractical for any sort of long-distance travel, either at sea or in the air, because of space, weight and energy capacity. Any fuel source has to be energy dense and compatible with existing equipment, meaning that hydrogen is also not useful for shipping or long-distance flying, though batteries and hydrogen could have a place in short-distance applications. “Hydrogen is great on an energy-per-mass basis, but it’s horrible on an energy-per-volume basis,” says Steve Csonka, executive director of the Commercial Aviation Alternative Fuels Initiative. “Volume requirements in an airplane turn into drag and weight so you’d have to significantly restrict the range on new aircraft.”Supply and Demand&nbsp; As we close in on decarbonization target dates set by the IMO and ICAO, the growth in biofuel demand is becoming obvious. Independent advisory organization DNV projected that by 2050, the maritime industry will have an energy demand of up to nearly twice the current global level of biofuel production. Aviation is expected to have an even higher demand for biofuels.On the supply side, in a 2022 report, the International Energy Agency says that the global supply of biofuel could triple between 2021 and 2030. However, this increase is not enough to meet aviation’s demands for biofuel by 2030, and the picture is even less favorable by 2050. “Even with a threefold increase, we’ll only have enough to meet half of the aviation sector’s energy demand,” Lewis says.At the same time, biofuels cost more than petroleum-based fuel. Estimates from the low-carbon fuels consortium BC-SMART show that SAF, sometimes also referred to as biojet, is currently two to three times more expensive than conventional jet fuel. Policies that nudge SAF production—like those used to get ethanol production going in the early 2000s—may be needed. “Innovation has made ethanol production quite efficient,” says Jack Saddler, professor of bioenergy and biofuels at the University of British Columbia. “And I’m optimistic costs will come down for biojet, too.”SAF can be made from a variety of feedstocks that include starches like corn and sugarcane and lipid feedstocks like soybeans, animal fat or waste oils and grease. However, lipid feedstocks are an area where biofuels for planes and ships can come into conflict.“There’s a natural tug back and forth for a producer to ask whether it’s more profitable to produce biodiesel or if they should go after SAF production,” Csonka says.Profitability will come down to policy choices and market forces. Specifically, an industry’s willingness to pay more for a resource will determine how feedstocks get used. And with fewer fuel options available, the aviation industry will likely be willing to pay far more. Fortunately, the maritime industry can turn to energy sources other than biofuels. “One of the main punchlines of our research is that the marine sector has a variety of different fuel options,” Saddler says.Multiple Choice&nbsp; One option some are turning to is natural gas. While natural gas is a fossil fuel, it has a slightly lower carbon intensity than fuel oil and is better from an emissions perspective. Other options that shipping companies are looking into include bio-liquid natural gas, which is derived from renewable natural gas, as well as methanol. Green methanol can be made using biogenic feedstocks like wood waste or by combining hydrogen from water with carbon dioxide collected from the air. However, these processes are expensive and require lots of electricity, while the least expensive way to make methanol relies on fossil fuels, Saddler says.As with aviation, hydrogen is another possible fuel source; however, the maritime industry runs into similar issues with energy density that make hydrogen less appealing as a long-range fuel. Another possible fuel source that is attracting attention in the maritime world is ammonia. An ammonia molecule contains no carbon, so burning it produces no carbon dioxide. “The best option for shipping, as far as we can tell, is ammonia,” Lewis says.Ammonia can’t be used as a drop-in fuel, but marine engines can be modified to use it, and it is easier and cheaper to store than hydrogen. However, ammonia is less energy dense than fuel oil, so ships would need larger storage tanks. Ports would also need to upgrade infrastructure to handle ammonia fueling. Lastly, ammonia is toxic, meaning that ships would need additional safety measures. But since the maritime industry has transported ammonia as cargo for decades, there are already safe-handling procedures in place, and ammonia tankers would be good candidates for large-scale trials of ammonia as a marine fuel. &nbsp;Everything Changes&nbsp; The lower energy density of ammonia, while a challenge for shipping, would be a deal breaker for aviation due to tighter constraints on weight and volume. Aviation also needs a direct replacement for fossil-based jet fuel, as engines can’t be easily modified to run on ammonia. At the same time, airports would have a far harder time adding ammonia fueling infrastructure than ports, and the safety risks the fuel poses make it a nonstarter for aviation.“We have issues around physical asphyxiation in the event of a tank leak, which is why we’re not enamored with ammonia,” Csonka says.&nbsp;Despite recent advances in SAF production and potential breakthroughs with ammonia, the aviation and maritime industries are still at the mercy of supply and demand. What the industries need are more feedstocks and innovative strategies like the use of wood and agricultural waste as feedstocks. Additionally, more intensive production of biofuel feedstocks raises questions about land use changes that increase the overall carbon intensity of the finished product and concerns about diverting food crops to fuel production.This last concern is what has driven the European Union to pursue what they refer to as fuels of nonbiological origin. Instead of using biogenic feedstocks like corn or soy to make biofuel, European producers take carbon captured from the air and hydrogen produced through electrolysis of water and stitch those molecules together to make fuel. This process requires a lot of energy, but if done with renewable electricity sources, it can make sustainable fuels. However, fuels made this way are even more expensive than those made with biological feedstocks. Additionally, it is possible that renewable electricity will be more useful for powering air conditioning and other parts of modern life than for making jet fuel.“We’re talking about adding a factor of two or three times more,” Saddler says. “That’s why they’ve put a mandate in place.”The United Kingdom in late 2025 signaled it may be softening its stance on crop-based SAF, with the government &nbsp;gathering stakeholder input that could provide a pathway to open the country’s SAF mandate program to crop-based biofuels.Looking Ahead&nbsp;&nbsp; While the aviation and maritime industries can no longer be seen as completely separate markets, they aren’t necessarily in direct competition for fuels to meet their decarbonization targets. With smart policies, continued development of new technologies to make methanol, ammonia, SAF and other fuels could lead to lowered costs. If done right, developing a so-called bioeconomy could drive reduced emissions, improve rural economies and address farming sustainability issues. “Growing a bioeconomy lowers prices for every product produced from those resources,” Csonka says.&nbsp;Achieving net-zero carbon emissions in shipping and aviation will take a nuanced approach that looks at interactions between industries and an assortment of solutions. This will involve closer looks at technology, land use, feedstock production and distribution networks for different types of fuel.“Every approach has pluses and minuses,” Saddler adds. “There is no silver bullet.”Author: George Hale&nbsp; SAF Magazine Contributing Writer&nbsp; &nbsp;

2026-03-09 - Shared Skies, Shared Seas Commonalities and Competition for Marine Biofuels and SAF (SAF Magazine)

medium_feat3-saf-lede-0126.jpg

small_feat3-saf-lede-0126.jpg

thumbnail_feat3-saf-lede-0126.jpg

feat3-saf-lede-0126.jpg

Technological pathways, feedstocks and refining infrastructure are linking sustainable aviation fuel and marine biofuels as both sectors compete for limited lipid and waste-based resources, policy support and market priority.

Shared Skies, Shared Seas Commonalities and Competition for Marine Biofuels and SAF

Sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) is transitioning from aspiration to implementation, a shift that was on full display during a recent session at the Clean Fuels Conference held in Orlando in January. Leaders from across the aviation and clean fuels value chain examined how production realities, infrastructure constraints and evolving policy frameworks are shaping SAF’s next phase of deployment.Aviation’s decarbonization challenge is daunting. Fuel is the second-largest operating cost for airlines after labor, and aircraft are long-lived assets, often remaining in service for 25 to 30 years. While each new generation of aircraft delivers meaningful efficiency gains, wholesale changes in propulsion technology will take decades to penetrate the fleet. As a result, low-carbon, drop-in fuels remain the only realistic pathway for achieving near- and midterm emissions reductions at scale.At the same time, aviation demand continues to grow. Global jet fuel consumption totals roughly 100 billion gallons annually and is increasing at 1.5% to 2% percent per year, according to Sean Newsum, managing director of environmental affairs at Airlines for America. Even with efficiency improvements, demand is projected to reach 130 billion to 150 billion gallons by midcentury as the global fleet expands. As Newsum emphasized during the conference discussion, this growth underscores the urgency of scaling SAF alongside—rather than in opposition to—industry demand.SAF is not a recent experiment. The aviation sector has spent decades developing and certifying alternative fuels, beginning with the first commercial biofuels flight in 2008. Since then, the industry has embraced a technology- and feedstock-neutral approach, recognizing that long-term emissions reductions will require a portfolio of pathways optimized for lifecycle performance, regional feedstock availability and infrastructure compatibility. Newsum said this framework supports aviation’s commitment to net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.Scaling Supply While Maintaining Integrity&nbsp; Conference panelists highlighted that U.S. SAF production is expanding from a small but meaningful base. In early 2024, domestic capacity stood at approximately 84,000 gallons per day from two facilities. By the end of the year, new and expanded operations brought total production capacity to roughly 1.6 million gallons per day.This growth has broader implications across the clean fuels ecosystem, noted Tom Michels, director of government affairs at United Airlines. As some facilities reallocate capacity from renewable diesel to SAF, biodiesel production is backfilling displaced volumes, reinforcing demand across agricultural and feedstock supply chains. From a systems perspective, Michels says these shifts highlight the interconnected nature of clean fuel markets and the importance of policies that account for economy-wide emissions outcomes.While hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids pathways dominate current volumes, emerging technologies such as ethanol-to-jet are nearing commercial production. Continued investment in next-generation pathways remains essential to diversify feedstocks, manage long-term costs and reduce carbon intensity. However, moving from demonstration to commercial scale remains a critical hurdle, requiring confidence in both policy durability and market demand.Affordability, Reliability and Demand Signals&nbsp; Affordability, not immediate price parity, will determine SAF adoption, explained Michael AuBuchon, president of Saffron Consulting and former managing director of fuel strategy and management for Southwest Airlines. Producers are increasingly expected to demonstrate a credible path toward cost reduction over time, recognizing that scale is essential for meaningful emissions reductions.Operational reliability is equally important. SAF must be blended with conventional jet fuel and transported, often by rail, to airports that may lack dedicated infrastructure. As production expands geographically, logistics planning becomes a core component of environmental performance, ensuring that emission reductions achieved at the production stage are preserved through delivery and use.AuBuchon said corporate customers are also shaping the market. Sustainability commitments increasingly require SAF purchases to meet specific environmental criteria, particularly in the European Union and the United Kingdom. These requirements are driving greater scrutiny of feedstocks, certification pathways and lifecycle analysis from logistics customers and business travelers. There is a growing openness to agricultural feedstocks such as corn and soy, once largely absent from aviation discussions, as stakeholders balance sustainability goals with the need for scale and availability.Policy Certainty and Infrastructure Challenges&nbsp; Policy design remains central to SAF’s trajectory. While incentive-based approaches have played a key role in building the U.S. biofuels industry, SAF transactions today rely on stacking multiple mechanisms, including federal and state incentives, corporate contributions and airline premiums. Long-term policy certainty is essential for attracting the capital required to build and operate SAF facilities.Mandates were discussed as one potential tool to provide demand certainty, particularly for investors evaluating older infrastructure. However, international experience illustrates that mandate design matters. When obligations fall on fuel suppliers rather than producers, value may be captured without incentivizing new capacity or improving environmental outcomes. Well-structured incentives can directly support production, innovation and emissions performance.Panelists also identified infrastructure as an emerging bottleneck. Storage capacity, blending requirements and pipeline access vary widely by region, and regulatory frameworks have not always kept pace with SAF’s unique characteristics. In some cases, rules intended to reduce emissions risk actually constrain the fuels needed to achieve those reductions. Addressing these challenges will require continued engagement with regulators grounded in technical understanding and data-driven analysis.Looking Ahead&nbsp; The Clean Fuels Conference discussion made clear that SAF has moved beyond proof of conept. Production is scaling, demand signals are strengthening and policy tools are beginning to align. However, the industry remains in an early stage, where careful attention to lifecycle emissions, logistics and long-term policy certainty will determine success.For SAF to fully deliver on its promise, growth must be both rapid and responsible. Striking that balance between scale and integrity will define the next chapter of aviation’s decarbonization journey.Author: Veronica Bradley&nbsp; Director of Environmental Science&nbsp; Clean Fuels Alliance America

2026-03-09 - SAF’s Next Flight: Aligning Scale, Policy and Climate Impact (SAF Magazine)

small_contribution-saf-panel-0126.jpg

thumbnail_contribution-saf-panel-0126.jpg

contribution-saf-panel-0126.jpg

SAF’s Next Flight: Aligning Scale, Policy and Climate Impact

For ethanol producers, the key to unlocking sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) eligibility and premium pricing lies in lowering carbon intensity (CI) scores. Airlines and refiners are pursuing SAF to meet decarbonization targets, and California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard offers strong incentives for low-carbon fuels.One of the most effective strategies is onsite or nearby carbon capture and storage (CCS)—a solution that leverages ethanol’s unique advantage: a high-purity CO2 stream from fermentation that can be dehydrated and compressed at relatively low cost and injected into suitable saline formations via Class VI wells.This article explores the permitting, policy, incentives and practical steps for implementing CCS at ethanol facilities, drawing on Geostock Sandia’s experience and current U.S. regulatory frameworks.Why CCS for Ethanol?&nbsp; Capturing CO2 from ethanol fermentation is relatively straightforward because the gas stream is already high in purity. Lifecycle modeling shows that CCS can significantly reduce ethanol CI, enabling compliance with SAF requirements and California LCFS. Projects like Blue Flint Ethanol in North Dakota demonstrate feasibility, capturing and injecting more than 200,000 metric tons of CO2 annually into deep saline formations.Onsite CCS is ideal where geology supports injection, such as the Arbuckle Formation in Kansas or Broom Creek in North Dakota. Where local geology is unsuitable, producers can rail or truck CO2 to a nearby storage hub if it is economically feasible.Regulatory Framework: UIC Class VI and MRV&nbsp; CCS projects in the United States require a Class VI permit under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Underground Injection Control program, in effect since the 1970s. These wells are specifically designed for geologic CO2 sequestration and must meet stringent standards to ensure underground sources of drinking water aquifers are preserved and that no induced seismicity will occur.The process begins with site characterization, which includes a detailed assessment of geology, sealing formations and any legacy wells that could affect containment. Operators must also perform Area of Review (AoR) modeling to predict the movement of the CO2 plume and pressure front over time.Well construction is subject to rigorous integrity testing to ensure safe injection and long-term containment. Continuous monitoring, verification and accounting is required throughout the life of the project to track injection performance and detect any anomalies. In addition, operators must demonstrate financial responsibility and prepare for post-injection care, which includes monitoring after injection ceases and eventual site closure.EPA permitting timelines typically range from 18 to 24 months, although states with Class VI primacy—such as North Dakota, Wyoming, Louisiana and Texas—may process applications more quickly. Beyond the Class VI permit, operators must also submit a an MVA plan to the EPA for greenhouse gas reporting. This plan ensures transparent accounting of injected CO2 volumes and is essential for claiming federal incentives like the 45Q tax credit for carbon capture and storage or utilization.Economic Drivers&nbsp; The financial case for CCS is strong because multiple incentives can be combined along the value chain that far exceeds the cost to sequester CO2 onsite.First, the federal 45Q tax credit provides $85 per ton of CO2 permanently stored in geologic formations, creating a direct revenue stream from the captured emissions. In addition, California’s LCFS rewards low-CI ethanol, generating credits that can be sold in the LCFS market.Beyond these programs, ethanol that qualifies for conversion into SAF earns a premium price and 45Z Clean Fuel Production Tax Credits per gallon, reflecting its compliance with stringent lifecycle greenhouse gas reduction requirements and low CI. It is important to note, however, that the 45Z and 45Q tax credits cannot be stacked for the same facility.These incentives not only monetize the CO2 stream itself, &nbsp;but also enable ethanol producers to command higher prices for SAF-qualified fuel, making CCS a compelling economic strategy.Technical Considerations&nbsp; Ethanol fermentation produces a nearly pure CO2 stream, requiring little processing for sequestration underground. Compared to post-combustion capture (natural gas, for example), this simplicity makes CCS at ethanol plants one of the lowest-cost industrial decarbonization options.The process begins with dehydration and compression, bringing the CO2 to a supercritical state suitable for injection 3,000 to 10,000 feet underground. The selection of construction material is critical: the purity of the CO2 influences the choice of casing and completion utilized in the well—often 25Cr steel—and the type of cement used to prevent corrosion over decades of operation.Monitoring systems play an equally important role. Technologies such as fiber-optic sensors and seismic arrays provide real-time data on plume migration and pressure changes deep underground. Before any injection occurs, a stratigraphic test well is drilled to confirm injectivity and calibrate the AoR models, which guide the design of the final injection wells.Permitting Timeline&nbsp; The permitting process for CCS projects follows a structured sequence. It begins with prefeasibility and site screening, which evaluates the storage horizon, sealing layers, legacy wells, capacity and pore space ownership. Next, a stratigraphic test well is drilled to collect core samples, petrophysical properties and fluid samples, as well as perform advanced injectivity tests. These data sets help refine reservoir models and monitoring plans.Once the site is characterized, the operator submits a Class VI permit application to the regulator for review, which can last up to 24 months. This includes AoR modeling, detailed plans for construction, operation, testing and monitoring, along with financial assurance documentation. In parallel, an MRV plan under EPA Subpart RR is prepared to ensure compliance with greenhouse gas reporting requirements.After public notice and comment periods, and once the permit is finalized, drilling and completion of injection and monitoring wells can proceed. Commissioning follows, and the site enters the operational phase, which involves continuous monitoring and reporting. Finally, after injection ceases, the project enters Post-Injection Site Care, which includes long-term monitoring and closure activities as specified in the permit.Risk Management&nbsp; Several risks must be managed throughout the CCS lifecycle. Permit timing and data expectations are significant; regulators increasingly require detailed seismic and stratigraphic data, which means test wells are essential but add time and cost.Pore space title and community engagement should be addressed early to avoid legal disputes and meet guidelines issued by the EPA. Well design, operations and construction play an important role in the success of CO2 sequestration.Conclusion&nbsp; Implementing CCS offers ethanol producers multiple advantages. It enables qualification for SAF markets under LCFS and federal programs, opens new revenue streams through 45Q or 45Z tax credits and LCFS credits, and enhances brand value as a supplier of low-carbon fuels. Most importantly, CCS helps future-proof operations against tightening CI standards and growing sustainability requirements.Onsite or nearby Class VI sequestration of fermentation CO2 is one of the fastest, most economical routes for U.S. ethanol producers to materially lower CI and qualify for SAF and other markets—especially in California, where value increases with deeper CI cuts and verification rigor.With solid geology, disciplined permitting, clear pore space rights and a robust monitoring program, the CCS strategy can be executed to unlock CO2 value while meeting airlines’ low-CI SAF demand.Author: Sylvain Riba&nbsp; President and CEO, Geostock Sandia LLC&nbsp; 346-314-4303&nbsp; sylvain.riba@geostocksandia.com&nbsp; &nbsp;

2026-03-09 - Onsite Carbon Capture and Storage: A Strategic Path for Ethanol Producers to Access the SAF Market (SAF Magazine)

small_Cont2-GeostockSandiaLede.jpg

thumbnail_Cont2-GeostockSandiaLede.jpg

Cont2-GeostockSandiaLede.jpg

Onsite Carbon Capture and Storage: A Strategic Path for Ethanol Producers to Access the SAF Market

thumbnail_Issue1_SAF26-Cover.jpg

Issue1_SAF26-Cover.jpg

SAF Magazine - Issue 1 2026

SAF Magazine - Issue 1 2026

Columns

Despite Challenges, the Beat Goes On

Treasury’s Proposed 45Z Guidance Draws Concerns Over Alcohol-to-Jet SAF

Featured

Accelerating Innovation

A New Chapter in Farm-Driven Biofuels

Shared Skies, Shared Seas Commonalities and Competition for Marine Biofuels and SAF

Contributions

SPOTLIGHT | VISTA PROJECTS: De-Risking SAF with the Right Design

SAF’s Next Flight: Aligning Scale, Policy and Climate Impact

Onsite Carbon Capture and Storage: A Strategic Path for Ethanol Producers to Access the SAF Market

SAF Magazine - Issue 1 2026.css-7jxktu{position:absolute;bottom:0px;left:0px;right:0px;height:3px;border-radius:3px;background-color:var(--chakra-colors-brandBlack);}

Columns

Despite Challenges, the Beat Goes On

Treasury’s Proposed 45Z Guidance Draws Concerns Over Alcohol-to-Jet SAF

Featured

Accelerating Innovation

A New Chapter in Farm-Driven Biofuels

Shared Skies, Shared Seas Commonalities and Competition for Marine Biofuels and SAF

Contributions

SPOTLIGHT | VISTA PROJECTS: De-Risking SAF with the Right Design

SAF’s Next Flight: Aligning Scale, Policy and Climate Impact

Onsite Carbon Capture and Storage: A Strategic Path for Ethanol Producers to Access the SAF Market

SAF Magazine - Issue 1 2026